🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as one of the deadliest – and momentous – dates in three decades of conflict in this area.

Within the community where events unfolded – the images of that fateful day are displayed on the buildings and embedded in people's minds.

A protest demonstration was organized on a wintry, sunny day in the city.

The demonstration was a protest against the policy of imprisonment without charges – imprisoning people without legal proceedings – which had been implemented after an extended period of conflict.

Troops from the elite army unit shot dead 13 people in the district – which was, and still is, a overwhelmingly republican population.

A specific visual became notably prominent.

Images showed a clergyman, Fr Edward Daly, using a blood-stained fabric while attempting to shield a assembly moving a young man, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

Journalists captured considerable film on the day.

The archive includes the priest telling a journalist that military personnel "just seemed to fire in all directions" and he was "completely sure" that there was no justification for the gunfire.

The narrative of events wasn't accepted by the first inquiry.

The first investigation concluded the military had been attacked first.

During the negotiation period, Tony Blair's government established another inquiry, following pressure by surviving kin, who said Widgery had been a inadequate investigation.

During 2010, the report by the investigation said that on balance, the military personnel had fired first and that zero among the victims had been armed.

The then head of state, the leader, apologised in the House of Commons – stating killings were "improper and unacceptable."

Law enforcement commenced look into the events.

One former paratrooper, identified as the defendant, was charged for killing.

Accusations were made regarding the deaths of James Wray, twenty-two, and in his mid-twenties the second individual.

The defendant was further implicated of trying to kill multiple individuals, additional persons, more people, Michael Quinn, and an unidentified individual.

Remains a court ruling protecting the veteran's privacy, which his lawyers have argued is necessary because he is at danger.

He told the investigation that he had solely shot at persons who were armed.

The statement was dismissed in the concluding document.

Information from the examination would not be used directly as proof in the court case.

In court, the defendant was screened from view using a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the first time in court at a hearing in December 2024, to answer "not guilty" when the accusations were put to him.

Relatives of the victims on the incident travelled from the city to the courthouse every day of the case.

A family member, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they were aware that attending the trial would be difficult.

"I remember the events in my mind's eye," he said, as we walked around the main locations referenced in the proceedings – from Rossville Street, where his brother was shot dead, to the nearby the area, where one victim and the second person were died.

"It reminds me to my position that day.

"I participated in moving the victim and place him in the medical transport.

"I went through each detail during the testimony.

"But even with having to go through all that – it's still valuable for me."