🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.