🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a latest court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Reconsider Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also vacated a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the authority and valid reason to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while local authorities assert that local officers have control of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the president cannot send the military into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and autonomy as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”