🔗 Share this article

US government attorneys have stated that a Libyan man willingly confessed to participating in operations targeting Americans, comprising the 1988's Pan Am Flight 103 bombing and an unsuccessful attempt to target a US politician using a rigged overcoat.

Statement Details

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is alleged to have confessed his involvement in the deaths of 270 individuals when Pan Am 103 was destroyed over the Scottish town of the region, during interviewing in a Libyan holding center in the year 2012.

Known as the defendant, the 74-year-old has stated that three hooded persons compelled him to make the admission after intimidating him and his loved ones.

His legal representatives are working to block it from being utilized as testimony in his legal proceedings in the US capital next year.

Legal Battle

In answer, legal counsel from the US Department of Justice have said they can prove in court that the admission was "willing, trustworthy and accurate."

The availability of Mas'ud's purported statement was initially disclosed in 2020, when the United States announced it was charging him with building and preparing the IED utilized on Flight 103.

Defense Assertions

The father-of-six is accused of being a ex- official in Libya's intelligence service and has been in American detention since 2022.

He has stated innocent to the allegations and is expected to face trial at the US court for the the capital in April.

The defendant's lawyers are attempting to block the trial from learning about the admission and have presented a petition asking for it to be excluded.

They assert it was secured under duress following the overthrow which removed the Libyan leader in 2011.

Purported Pressure

They say former personnel of the leader's administration were being targeted with illegal murders, kidnappings and mistreatment when the suspect was seized from his residence by armed persons the next period.

He was moved to an unofficial holding location where additional detainees were purportedly abused and mistreated and was isolated in a tiny cell when three hooded men handed him a one page of paper.

His legal representatives stated its scripted information commenced with an order that he was to acknowledge to the Pan Am Flight 103 attack and a separate terrorist incident.

Significant Extremist Attacks

The defendant asserts he was told to memorise what it stated about the incidents and recite it when he was interrogated by a different individual the subsequent time.

Fearing for his security and that of his offspring, he claimed he believed he had no alternative but to comply.

In their answer to the defense's motion, lawyers from the American justice department have stated the judge was being petitioned to withhold "extremely relevant testimony" of Mas'ud's guilt in "several major extremist attacks directed at American people."

Authorities Rebuttals

They claim Mas'ud's account of occurrences is unbelievable and inaccurate, and argue that the details of the confession can be supported by credible independent proof collected over numerous years.

The government attorneys claim Mas'ud and fellow former officials of the former leader's intelligence service were kept in a covert holding center run by a armed group when they were questioned by an seasoned Libya's police officer.

They contend that in the turmoil of the post-revolution period, the center was "the protected location" for the suspect and the additional agents, accounting for the hostility and resistance sentiment widespread at the moment.

Interrogation Information

Based to the investigator who interviewed the defendant, the location was "well run", the inmates were not confined and there were no indications of torture or pressure.

The officer has stated that over 48 hours, a self-assured and well Mas'ud detailed his role in the bombings of Flight 103.

The FBI has also stated he had acknowledged building a device which went off in a Berlin nightclub in the mid-1980s, killing multiple persons, including multiple American soldiers, and harming dozens additional.

Other Accusations

He is also said to have detailed his involvement in an conspiracy on the life of an unnamed US foreign minister at a public event in the Asian country.

The defendant is said to have explained that a person travelling the American figure was bearing a explosive-laden overcoat.

It was the defendant's assignment to detonate the explosive but he decided not to proceed after learning that the individual carrying the item did not realize he was on a suicide mission.

He chose "not to activate the device" even though his supervisor in the intelligence service being with him at the moment and asking what was {going on|happening|occurring